Göbekli Tepe
Göbekli Tepe Turkish: [ɡøbe̞kli te̞pɛ] ("Potbelly Hill") is a 
Neolithic hilltop sanctuary erected at the top of a mountain ridge in 
the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey, some 15 kilometers (9 mi) 
northeast of the town of Şanlıurfa (formerly Urfa / Edessa). It is the 
oldest known human-made religious structure. The site was most 
likely erected in the 10th millennium BCE and has been under excavation 
since 1994 by German and Turkish archaeologists. Together with Nevalı
 Çori, it has revolutionized understanding of the Eurasian Neolithic.
Göbekli
 Tepe is located in southeastern Turkey. It was first noted in a survey 
conducted by Istanbul University and the University of Chicago in 1964, 
which recognized that the hill could not entirely be a natural feature 
and postulated that a Byzantine cemetery lay beneath. The survey noted a
 large number of flints and the presence of limestone slabs thought to 
be Byzantine grave markers. This work was first mentioned in print in 
Peter Benedict's article "Survey Work in Southeastern Anatolia" (1980). 
In 1994, archaeologist Klaus Schmidt of the German Archaeological 
Institute of Istanbul noted Benedict's article and visited the site, 
recognizing that it was in fact a much older Neolithic site. Since 
1995 excavations have been conducted by the German Archaeological 
Institute of Istanbul and the Şanlıurfa Museum, under the direction of 
Schmidt (University of Heidelberg 1995--2000, German Archaeological 
Institute 2001--present). The hill had been under agricultural 
cultivation before being excavated. Generations of local inhabitants had
 frequently moved rocks and placed them in clearance piles and much 
archaeological evidence may have been destroyed in the process. Scholars
 from the Hochschule Karlsruhe began documenting the architectural 
remains and soon discovered T-shaped pillars facing south-east. Some of 
these pillars had apparently undergone attempts at destruction, probably
 by farmers who mistook them for ordinary large rocks.

 
Göbekli Tepe on National Geography
Göbekli Tepe 
Joe Rogan and Duncan Trussell talk about ancient cataclysms and the Göbekli Tepe ruins. Audio from The Joe Rogan Experience Podcast. Animated by Paul Klawiter- www.KlawiterStudios.com
Gobekli Tepe Stone Circles


 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Disclose.tv - Ancient Aliens: Unexplained Structures pt 1/3
Gobekli Tepe (Turkish for "Hill with a potbelly") is a hilltop sanctuary
 erected on the highest point of an elongated mountain ridge some 15 km 
northeast of the town of Sanliurfa(formerly Urfa / Edessa) in 
southeastern Turkey. The site, currently undergoing excavation by German
 and Turkish archaeologists, was erected by hunter-gatherers in the 10th
 millennium BC (ca. 11,500 years ago), before the advent of sedentism. 
Mysteriously, the entire complex of stones, pillars and carvings was 
then deliberately buried in 8000 BC. Together with Nevalõ Cori, it has 
revolutionized understanding of the Eurasian Neolithic.
Gobekli Tepe is located in southeastern Turkey. It had already been 
noted in an American survey in 1964, which recognized that the hill 
could not entirely be a natural feature, but assumed that a Byzantine 
cemetery lay beneath. Since 1994 excavations have been conducted by the 
German Archaeological Institute (Istanbul branch) and Sanliurfa Museum, 
under the direction of the German archaeologist Klaus Schmidt 
(1995Ð2000: University of Heidelberg; since 2001: German Archaeological 
Institute). Schmidt says that the stone fragments on the surface made 
him aware immediately that the site was prehistoric. Before then, the 
hill had been under agricultural cultivation; generations of local 
inhabitants had frequently moved rocks and placed them in clearance 
piles; much archaeological evidence may have been destroyed in the 
process. Scholars from the Hochschule Karlsruhe began documenting the 
architectural remains. They soon discovered T-shaped pillars, some of 
which had apparently undergone attempts at smashing.
The Complex
Gobekli Tepe is the oldest human-made place of worship yet discovered. 
Until excavations began, a complex on this scale was not thought 
possible for a community so ancient. The massive sequence of 
stratification layers suggests several millennia of activity, perhaps 
reaching back to the Mesolithic. The oldest occupation layer (stratum 
III) contains monolithic pillars linked by coarsely built walls to form 
circular or oval structures. So far, four such buildings, with diameters
 between 10 and 30m have been uncovered. Geophysical surveys indicate 
the existence of 16 additional structures.
Stratum II, dated to Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) (7500-6000 BC), has 
revealed several adjacent rectangular rooms with floors of polished 
lime, reminiscent of Roman terrazzo floors. The most recent layer 
consists of sediment deposited as the result of agricultural activity.
The monoliths are decorated with carved reliefs of animals and of 
abstract pictograms. The pictograms cannot be classed as writing, but 
may represent commonly understood sacred symbols, as known from 
Neolithic cave paintings elsewhere. The carefully carved figurative 
reliefs depict lions, bulls, boars, foxes, gazelles, asses, snakes and 
other reptiles, insects, arachnids, and birds, particularly vultures and
 water fowl. At the time the shrine was constructed the surrounding 
country was much lusher and capable of sustaining this variety of 
wildlife, before millennia of settlement and cultivation resulted in the
 nearÐDust Bowl conditions prevailing today.
Vultures also feature in the iconography of the Neolithic sites of 
‚atalhoyuk and Jericho; it is believed that in the early Neolithic 
culture of Anatolia and the Near East the deceased were deliberately 
exposed in order to be excarnated by vultures and other birds of prey. 
(The head of the deceased was sometimes removed and preserved - possibly
 a sign of ancestor worship.) This, then, would represent an early form 
of sky burial.
Few humanoid forms have surfaced at Gobekli Tepe but include a relief of
 a naked woman, posed frontally in a crouched position, that Schmidt 
likens to the Venus accueillante figures found in Neolithic north 
Africa; and of at least one decapitated corpse surrounded by vultures. 
Some of the pillars, namely the T-shaped ones, have carved arms, which 
may indicate that they represent stylized humans (or anthropomorphic 
gods). Another example is decorated with human hands in what could be 
interpreted as a prayer gesture, with a simple stole or surplice 
engraved above; this may be intended to represent a temple priest.
Architecture
The houses or temples are round megalithic buildings. The walls are made
 of unworked dry stone and include numerous T-shaped monolithic pillars 
of limestone that are up to 3 m high. Another, bigger pair of pillars is
 placed in the centre of the structures. There is evidence that the 
structures were roofed; the central pair of pillars may have supported 
the roof. The floors are made of terrazzo (burnt lime), and there is a 
low bench running along the whole of the exterior wall.
The reliefs on the pillars include foxes, lions, cattle, wild boars, 
wild asses, herons, ducks, scorpions, ants, spiders, many snakes, and a 
very few anthropomorphic figures. Some of the reliefs have been 
deliberately erased, maybe in preparation for new designs. There are 
freestanding sculptures as well that may represent wild boars or foxes. 
As they are heavily encrusted with lime, it is sometimes difficult to 
tell. Comparable statues have been discovered at Nevali Cori and Nahal 
Hemar.
The quarries for the statues are located on the plateau itself; some 
unfinished pillars have been found there in situ. The biggest unfinished
 pillar is still 6.9 m long; a length of 9m has been reconstructed. This
 is much larger than any of the finished pillars found so far. The stone
 was quarried with stone picks. Bowl-like depressions in the limestone 
rocks may already have served as mortars or fire-starting bowls in the 
epipalaeolithic. There are some phalloi and geometric patterns cut into 
the rock as well; their dating is uncertain.
While the structures are primarily temples, more recently smaller 
domestic buildings have been uncovered. Despite this, it is clear that 
the primary use of the site was cultic and not domestic. Schmidt 
believes this "cathedral on a hill" was a pilgrimage destination 
attracting worshipers up to a hundred miles distant.
Butchered bones 
found in large numbers from local game such as deer, gazelle, pigs, and 
geese suggest that ritual feasting (and perhaps sacrifice) were 
regularly practiced here.
The site was deliberately backfilled sometime after 8000 BC: the 
buildings are covered with settlement refuse that must have been brought
 from elsewhere. These deposits include flint tools like scrapers and 
arrowheads and animal bones. The lithic inventory is characterized by 
Byblos points and numerous Nemrik-points. There are Helwan-points and 
Aswad-points as well.
Chronological Context
All statements about the site must be considered preliminary, as only 
about 5% of the site's total area has been excavated as yet; floor 
levels have been reached in only the second complex (complex B), which 
also contained a terrazzo-like floor. Schmidt believes that the dig 
could well continue for another fifty years. So far excavations have 
revealed very little evidence for residential use. Through the 
radiocarbon method, the end of stratum III can be fixed at circa 9,000 
BC (see above); its beginnings are estimated to 11,000 BC or earlier. 
Stratum II dates to about 8,000 BC.
Archaeologist Ofer Ben-Yosef of Harvard has said he would not be 
surprised if evidence surfaces proving slave labor was involved which 
would also represent something of a first, since hunting-gathering 
communities are traditionally thought to have been egalitarian and to 
predate slavery. At any rate, it is generally believed that an elite 
class of religious leaders supervised the work and later controlled 
whatever ceremonies took place here. If so, this would be the oldest 
known evidence for a priestly caste - much earlier than such social 
distinctions developed elsewhere in the Near East. 
Around the beginning of the 8th millennium BC "Potbelly Hill" lost its 
importance. The advent of agriculture and animal husbandry brought new 
realities to human life in the area, and the "stone-age zoo" (as Schmidt
 calls it) depicted on the pillars apparently lost whatever significance
 it had had for the region's older, foraging, communities. But the 
complex was not simply abandoned and forgotten, to be gradually 
destroyed by the elements. Instead, it was deliberately buried under 300
 to 500 cubic metres of soil.  Why this was done is unknown, but it 
preserved the monuments for posterity.
Interpretation and Importance
Gobekli Tepe is regarded as an archaeological discovery of the greatest 
importance, since it profoundly changes our understanding of a crucial 
stage in the development of human societies. It seems that the erection 
of monumental complexes was within the capacities of hunter-gatherers 
and not only of sedentary farming communities as had been previously 
assumed. In other words, as excavator Klaus Schmidt put it: "First came 
the temple, then the city." This revolutionary hypothesis will have to 
be supported or modified by future research.
Schmidt considers Gobekli Tepe a central location for a cult of the 
dead. He suggests that the carved animals are there to protect the dead.
 Though no tombs or graves have been found so far, Schmidt believes they
 remain to be discovered beneath the sacred circles' floors. Schmidt 
also interprets it in connection with the initial stages of an incipient
 Neolithic. It is one of several neolithic sites in the vicinity of 
Mount Karaca Dag, an area where geneticists suspect the origins of at 
least some of our cultivated grains (see Einkorn). Such scholars suggest
 that the Neolithic revolution, i.e., the beginnings of grain 
cultivation, took place here. Schmidt and others believe that mobile 
groups in the area were forced to cooperate with each other to protect 
early concentrations of wild cereals from wild animals (herds of 
gazelles and wild donkeys). This would have led to an early social 
organization of various groups in the area of Gobekli Tepe. Thus, 
according to Schmidt, the Neolithic did not begin at a small scale in 
the form of individual instances of garden cultivation, but started 
immediately as a large-scale social organisation ("a full-scale 
revolution").
Not only its large dimensions, but the side-by-side existence of 
multiple pillar shrines makes the location unique. There are no 
comparable monumental complexes from its time. Nevali Cori, a well-known
 Neolithic settlement also excavated by the German Archaeological 
Institute, and submerged by the Ataturk Dam since 1992, is 500 years 
later, its T-shaped pillars are considerably smaller, and its shrine was
 located inside a village; the roughly contemporary architecture at 
Jericho is devoid of artistic merit or large-scale sculpture; and 
Catalhoyuk, perhaps the most famous of all Anatolian Neolithic villages,
 is 2,000 years younger.
Schmidt has engaged in some speculation regarding the belief systems of 
the groups that created Gobekli Tepe, based on comparisons with other 
shrines and settlements. He assumes shamanic practices and suggests that
 the T-shaped pillars may represent mythical creatures, perhaps 
ancestors, whereas he sees a fully articulated belief in gods only 
developing later in Mesopotamia, associated with extensive temples and 
palaces.
This corresponds well with an ancient Sumerian belief that agriculture, 
animal husbandry and weaving had been brought to mankind from the sacred
 mountain Du-Ku, which was inhabited by Annuna-deities, very ancient 
gods without individual names. Klaus Schmidt identifies this story as an
 oriental primeval myth that preserves a partial memory of the 
Neolithic. It is also apparent that the animal and other images give no 
indication of organized violence, i.e., there are no depictions of 
hunting raids or wounded animals, and the pillar carvings ignore game on
 which the society mainly subsisted, like deer, in favor of formidable 
creatures such as lions, snakes, spiders and scorpions.
At present, Gobekli Tepe raises more questions for archaeology and 
prehistory than it answers. We do not know how a force large enough to 
construct, augment, and maintain such a substantial complex was 
mobilized and paid or fed in the conditions of pre-Neolithic society. We
 cannot "read" the pictograms, and do not know for certain what meaning 
the animal reliefs had for visitors to the site; the variety of fauna 
depicted, from lions and boars to birds and insects, makes any single 
explanation problematic. 
As there seems to be little or no evidence of habitation, and the 
animals depicted on the stones are mainly predators - with the exception
 of gazelles, wild asses, insects and fowl - the stones may have been 
intended to stave off evils through some form of magic representation. 
Alternatively, they may have served as totems. It is not known why more 
and more walls were added to the interiors while the sanctuary was in 
use, with the result that some of the engraved pillars were obscured 
from view. Burial may or may not have occurred at the site. The reason 
the complex was eventually buried remains unexplained. Until more 
evidence is gathered, it is difficult to deduce anything certain about 
the originating culture.
 Gobekli Tepe
 
Gobekli Tepe   Wikipedia
Gobekli Tepe    Google Videos 
In the News ... 
 
'World's Oldest Temple' May Have Been Cosmopolitan Center    Live Science - March 16, 2012
  
Ancient blades made of volcanic rock that were discovered at what may be
 the world's oldest temple suggest that the site in Turkey was the hub 
of a pilgrimage  that attracted a cosmopolitan group of people some 
11,000 years ago.
The researchers matched up about 130 of the blades, which would have 
been used as tools, with their source volcanoes, finding people would 
have come from far and wide to congregate at the ancient temple site, 
Gobekli Tepe, in southern Turkey. The blades are made of obsidian, a 
volcanic glass rich with silica, which forms when lava cools quickly. he
 research was presented in February at the 7th International Conference 
on the Chipped and Ground Stone Industries of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic 
in Barcelona, Spain.
Only a tiny portion of Gobekli Tepe has been excavated so far, but what 
has been unearthed has been hailed by archaeologists as astounding for 
its great age and artistry.The site contains at least 20 stone rings, 
one circle built inside another, with diameters ranging from 30 to 100 
feet (10 to 30 meters). The researchers suspect people would fill in the
 outer ring with debris before building a new circle within.
T-shaped limestone blocks line the circles, and at their center are two 
massive pillars about 18 feet (5.5 m) tall. Statues and reliefs of 
people and animals were carved on these blocks and pillars. "Some of the
 stones the big pillars are bigger than Stonehenge," said Tristan 
Carter, one of the obsidian researchers and a professor of anthropology 
at McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada. (Research on the site has 
been ongoing since 1994 and is led by Klaus Schmidt of the German 
Archaeological Institute.)
Even more puzzling is what has not been found. The buildings contain no 
hearths and the plant and animal remains there show no signs of 
domestication. Also, so far there have been no buildings found that 
archaeologists can confirm were used for everyday living.
Taken together, the research indicates the site was created by 
hunter-gatherers, rather than farmers, who came from across a large area
 to build and then visit the site for religious purposes. This research 
is backed up by the style of some of the obsidian and stone tools which 
suggest that people were coming from Iraq, Iran, the Middle Euphrates 
and the eastern Mediterranean.
The discoveries made at Gobekli Tepe over the past two decades have led 
to a great deal of debate. Ted Banning, a professor of anthropology at 
the University of Toronto in Canada recently published a paper in the 
journal Current Anthropology arguing that interpretations of the site 
may be off. Banning suggests the stone-ring structures may have been 
roofed and used as houses, albeit ones filled with art that may have 
served as both a domestic space and religious area. He also suggests 
that the people of Gobekli Tepe could have been growing crops, pointing 
out that some of the stone tools would have been useful for harvesting 
and that, at such an early point in history, it is difficult to tell the
 difference between wild plants and animals and those that humans were 
trying to domesticate.
Volcanic Evidence
To try to solve some of the mysteries surrounding the site, Carter's 
team has used a combination of scientific tests to match up the chemical
 composition of the artifacts to the volcanoes from which the obsidian 
originally came. "The real strength of our work is this incredible 
specificity; we can say exactly which mountain it comes from, and 
sometimes even which flank of the volcano," Carter told LiveScience in 
an interview.  
At least three of the obsidian sources are located in central Turkey, in
 a region called Cappadocia, which is located nearly 300 miles (500 km) 
away from Gobekli Tepe. At least three other sources are from the 
eastern part of the country, close to Lake Van, about 150 miles (250 km)
 away from the site. Yet another source is located in northeast Turkey, 
also about 300 miles (500 km).
Researchers say that what make these results special are not so much the
 distances involved - 300 miles would be a trip from New York City to 
Buffalo, N.Y., sans any domesticated horses - but rather the sheer 
variety of obsidian sources used. "It's an aberration," Carter said. The
 obsidian finds back up "the idea of many people from many different 
areas coming to the site," he said.
More Mystery
He cautioned that just because some of the obsidian came from such 
distant sources, that doesn't mean that people were actually traveling 
directly from these regions to Gobekli Tepe. The obsidian may have been 
acquired by way of trade, turned into a tool, and then brought to the 
site.
To try to resolve this problem, the team is also looking at the way the 
obsidian tools were made. For example, they found that obsidian 
artifacts sourced to Cappadocia, in central Turkey, tend to be 
stylistically similar to artifacts found to the south of Gobekli Tepe in
 the Middle Euphrates region of Mesopotamia. Also some of the obsidian 
artifacts sourced to eastern Turkey, the Lake Van region, have 
similarities to those made in Iraq and Iran. Altogether, these finds 
suggest that some of the obsidian made its way south and east (possibly 
through trade) before it was turned into tools and brought to the site, 
another clue as to where people were coming from.
Though more research is needed to make any conclusive statements, if the
 team is right, then Gobekli Tepe was indeed something grand, a place of
 pilgrimage more than 11,000 years old that attracted people from across
 the region. "If Professor Schmidt is correct, this represents a very 
cosmopolitan area, this is almost the nodal point of the Near East," 
Carter said. "In theory, you could have people with different languages,
 very different cultures, coming together."
The obsidian samples were analyzed at facilities at the MusŽe du Louvre 
in Paris and McMaster University. In addition to Carter and Schmidt, the
 team includes Franois-Xavier Le Bourdonnec and GŽrard Poupeau of the 
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.